Autism Isn’t Sin: Mistaking Difference for Disobedience

The following is an excerpt from Jonathan Machnee’s “Autism & Christianity: A Square Peg in a Round Hole?” 

Within many Christian circles, autism in all its forms remains little understood. Autistic ways of thinking and processing are often construed by pastors and clergy as problems to fix, rather than as different ways of understanding. …

Don’t mistake difference for sin. Autistic people will see things differently; they will process information differently; and they will interpret relationships and social dynamics differently.

Christians often interpret these differences as sin, disobedience, defiance, or a lack of spiritual fruit, when in fact they are simply differences in neurodevelopment. While autistic people are undoubtedly imperfect and sin like everyone else, differences that are often benign are treated as matters of spiritual failure. …

Because people are different, the fruits of the Spirit (Gal 5:22–23) will often express themselves differently in an autistic person than a non-autistic person. What love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control look like in someone without autism will often be quite different from what they look like in an autistic person.

We know that these qualities take different forms across different genders, ages, and cultures. Yet for some reason, we fail to extend that same expectation to differences in neurodevelopment. We unfortunately expect these fruits to appear identical. But fruit looks different when it grows on different trees.1


  1. Jonathan Machnee, “Autism & Christianity: A Square Peg in a Round Hole?,” Word by Word (Logos Bible Study blog), May 15, 2026, https://www.logos.com/grow/min-autism-and-christianity-contextualization/. ↩︎

Gentiles Who Obey the Law: Believers or Unbelievers? | Jarvis Williams on Romans 2:14–15

Romans has several debated passages:

  • Does the slavery to sin described in Romans 7 match the experience of the believer or the unbeliever?
  • Does Romans 9 describe God predestining some for salvation and the rest to damnation?
  • What does it means for “all Israel” to be saved in Romans 11?
  • Must we always submit to the government per Romans 13.

However, when I taught through Romans back in 2013, I personally found Romans 2 to be the most difficult to interpret in the entire book, despite often being overlooked compared to these others.

Today New Testament scholar Jarvis Williams joins me on Logos’s What in the Word? to discuss the identity of these law-abiding gentiles. Are they

  1. Non-Christian pagans who, at least to some degree, abide by their morally calibrated consciences (natural law)?
  2. Or regenerate gentile Christians who have God’s law written on their hearts as promised in the new covenant?

Follow the show on YouTubeSpotifyApple Podcasts, and more.

Ham’s Sin Against Noah & the Curse of Canaan (Genesis 9:18–29) | Chad Bird

Immediately after the flood, Noah gets drunk, and Ham sins against him by “seeing” his “nakedness.” Noah responds by cursing Ham’s son, Canaan. But what exactly did Ham do against Noah, and why does Noah curse his son instead of Ham himself?

Additionally, this passage was infamously used to justify racism against and the enslavement of black Africans. Appeal was made to the so-called “curse of Ham.”

So how should we understand this passage? Dr. Chad Bird joins me on What in the Word? to discuss.

Follow the show on YouTubeSpotifyApple Podcasts, and more.

Paul’s Allegory of Sarah & Hagar (Galatians 4:21–31) | David deSilva

In Galatians 4:21–31, Paul reads Genesis 16 and 21 “allegorically,” taking Hagar and Sarah to represent two covenants and ways of seeking to secure God’s covenant promises.

So is Paul just playing fast and loose with the Old Testament? Dr. David deSilva joins me on What in the Word? to discuss.

Follow the show on YouTubeSpotifyApple Podcasts, and more.