How should we interpret the promises made to the people of Israel in the OT — are they being fulfilled in the church? Does God have a distinct plan for the nation of Israel separate from the church? How do Christians relate to the Mosaic Law? What does infant baptism have to do with our understanding of the Biblical Covenants? In short, these are all questions asking, How should we put our Bible’s together — and questions that both covenantal and dispensational theologies answer differently, with wide-ranging implications for how we read our Bibles, how we define the church, what we expect of the future, and how we live our Christian lives.
This episode serves as the first installment of a larger conversation on covenantal and dispensational theologies and their divergent ways of putting the Bible together. In today’s episode, Richard Lucas and Brent Parker lead us through a survey of the various view points that exist. In order of those that stress more continuity to those that stress more discontinuity, we look at:
-
Theonomy / Reconstructionism [3:50]
-
Traditional Covenant Theology [9:13]
-
20th Century Reformed Baptist Theology [24:02]
-
1689 Federalism [31:02]
-
Progressive Covenantalism [40:37]
-
New Covenant Theology [55:24]
-
Progressive Dispensationalism [1:04:7]
-
Traditional (or Revised) Dispensationalism [1:18:58]
-
Classic Dispensationalism [1:34:36]
Their book,
Access the episode here. (Available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Stitcher, and more.)
See all other content in this series.
Kirk E. Miller 