How should we interpretation the creation account in Genesis 1:1–2:3?
Vern Poythress joins me on What in the Word? to discuss.
Follow the show on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and more.
Continue readingHow should we interpretation the creation account in Genesis 1:1–2:3?
Vern Poythress joins me on What in the Word? to discuss.
Follow the show on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and more.
Continue readingYou should keep in mind that as I write this post, I am not taking a specific position on issues such as evolution, God and science, nor the meaning of Genesis 1-2. In this post I simply seek to share some thoughts I have on these matters. At times and in various circles, creation debates can be very heated. I understand that. But sometimes I think the result is that things get a little blown out of proportion. I’m not suggesting we compromise on vital truth. But I guess I’m calling us to examine what constitutes as that vital truth. In class last year, Dr. Carson reminded us of the words of Francis Schaeffer: something like, “what is the least Genesis 1-2 must be saying for the rest of the Bible to be true.” Secondary truths are not by nature unimportant truths. And I don’t want to downplay their importance. But they must be distinguished from primary doctrines. And either way, no context excludes the necessity of charitableness.